To kickoff the year, we have released our Physical AI Podcast episode: βPhysical AI 2026 Outlookββa fast-moving, technical conversation with advisory committee members about whatβs actually going to matter as AI leaves the cloud and enters factories, fleets, farms, jobsites, and robots.
Featured Physical AI Advisory committee member guests in this episode (and why they matter):
Apurv Naman Senior Product Manager, NVIDIA
Harnish Jani β AI Product & Innovation Executive (former BCG X)
Anupam Govil β Managing Partner, Avasant
Keith Newman β Managing Partner, The GTM Firm
David Cao β Managing Partner, F50
More about the Physical AI Advisory Committeeβa new leadership group bringing together builders and decision-makers across embodied AI, robotics, industrial automation, manufacturing, energy, infrastructure, logistics, and construction to shape what comes next.
What our committee predicts for the Physical AI landscape in 2026
Below are the 2026 outlook highlights (edited into newsletter form from a longer conversation):
πΉ Apurv (NVIDIA): Simulation-first becomes the default path to real-world autonomy Apurvβs outlook is that the next acceleration wave will come from teams who treat simulation as the training ground for everythingβusing world models to generate scenarios, bootstrap data, and shorten time-to-skill across new environments. In one clip, he describes how βworld foundation modelsβ can generate physics-aware scenarios from a prompt, and flags compute cost as a practical limiter on how far teams can push βeverything in simulation.β Why this matters: the broader ecosystem is investing heavily in physics-aware synthetic data generation and simulation pipelines, which is consistent with NVIDIAβs world foundation model framing and simulation/synthetic data positioning.
πΉ Anupam: 2026 is when enterprises escape AI pilot purgatory and scale into physical operations Anupamβs forecast focuses on the βenterprise reality checkβ: scaling Physical AI requires reliability, predictability, and latency performance at the edge. Why this matters: industrial systems are explicitly constrained by safety/performance requirements, and reliability + latency are recurring βhard requirementsβ in OT and industrial wireless contextsβespecially once AI is making real-time decisions.
πΉ Harnish: Physical AI expands beyond controlled indoor settings into messy outdoor domains Harnishβs 2026 view is a resurgence of robots and AI systems leaving structured indoor environments and moving into unpredictable outdoor settingsβconstruction, agriculture, and other real-world βlong tailβ conditionsβdriven by better edge deployment and more capable multimodal action models. Why this matters: vision-language-action progress is making it more credible to unify perception + language + action planning in a single model familyβcrucial for unconstrained environments.
πΉ David: The next bottleneck wonβt just be modelsβitβll be the robotics supply chain and services layer David flags a practical constraint: physical deployment scales through supply chains, integrators, testing, maintenance, logistics, and partsβan ecosystem that must mature alongside the models. (If youβre building in the βpicks and shovelsβ layerβthis is your opening.)
πΉ Keith: Data advantage shifts toward 3D workflowsβand governance becomes a moat Keithβs 2026 emphasis is that experimentation and proprietary data loops will determine who winsβand that 3D data around products, facilities, and fleets (plus licensing/protection) will become a major competitive differentiator. Why this matters: digital twin frameworks and standards are evolving because the world is pushing toward reusable, interoperable βdigital representations of physical systems,β not just one-off demos.
Full Episode on Youtube
Why weβre building this committee now
Physical AI is entering a phase where the hard problems arenβt only model architectureβtheyβre data pipelines, simulation-to-real transfer, edge reliability, safety constraints, and the industrial deployment surface area. Thatβs exactly why the advisory committee exists: to keep the ecosystem grounded in what works, what breaks, and whatβs worth funding or building next.
Join us and bring your perspective
If youβre leading in any of these areasβrobotics, embodied AI, industrial automation, fleet autonomy, smart infrastructure, energy systems, data centers, edge AI, manufacturing ops, or supply-chain modernizationβwe want your voice in the room.
Coming next: Product Alpha in the Age of Physical AI: Lessons from Groqβs $20B NVIDIA Deal with SC Moatti.
Which 2026 prediction do you agree with mostβand what are we missing? Drop your take in the comments. π